Postby Trevor » Sat Apr 21, 2012 10:42 pm
1. A 15-year marriage means she is gonna get, in all likelihood, a significant number of years of alimony. Plus CS for the kids until they emancipate.
2. If you live in AR, she can agree to "liberal < parenting time >" all she wants, and you will be restricted by your budget how many times per annum you can see the kids. If you book flights a month out, surprisingly the tickets from LR AR to LA CA are under $250. How many flights per year, plus hotel and rental car, entertainment and food, are you prepared to make at your current salary and vacation schedule and medical expenses in order to exercise your parenting time? Apparently not for SIX YEARS. Still think your decision was a smart one? Sleep well, pal.
3. Your STBX works part time, meaning she has all the time in the world to "devote to the kids." Like it or not, that's a fairly compelling argument to the knuckleheads who will decide your custody, if you and your X (who has proven perfectly willing to screw you over) cannot agree to something yourselves.
4. Part of being a dad is supporting your kids, sure, but doing it two time zones away is a huge stretch. You are making the argument (whether you're aware of it or not) that writing monthly checks to your X is counterbalanced by a Skype call every couple days and a few annual visits out west. I'm saying you're not correct. Something tells me your kids would agree with me, not you.
5. Your kids are plenty old enough for your spouse to get off her butt and work. She is exempt from economic necessity, then?
6. I think the economics are not compelling enough to justify being numerous states away from the kids. Look for work close to the kids. Try to get your STBX to work. As others have said numerous times here, better to flip burgers in your kids' CA neighborhood than to own the burger joint in AR.
7. Yes I know someone with your type of diabetes. No personal experience with it but he briefed me what to do if I saw him at his desk unresponsive.
8. Sorry, but you should know there is no way you'll get full custody, unless your kids are willing to testify that they really want to move from CA to AR to live with you. Is that likely to happen? Perhaps, though the judge is not compelled to pay attention to their opinions on the matter, though they surely can.
9. Honestly, I'd rather take the chance that the judge would misunderstand my intentions behind working less in order to be with my kids, than sentencing myself to six years with no parenting time with the kids. But you have to prioritize your own life and time with your kids. Have at it.
10. You will not "lose any chance of custody" if you move to CA to be near the kids. That sounds incredibly dumb, frankly, like some justification for keeping the status quo instead of sucking it up and going back to where the kids live, so you can see their soccer matches and piano recitals or whatever they love to do. That's impossible from AR. Can you imagine them never, for their entire high school careers, seeing their Dad in the stands watching them bump, set, spike? I don't think you have considered them much in your written posts.
11. Your perspective is bassackward. You wrote "Without a job I will hard pressed to show the judge that I am capable of supporting my kids," but I push back to you with "Without proximity to the kids I will hard pressed to show the judge that I am capable of parenting my kids." Sorry, your argument sucks in comparison.
12. "Why don't you offer me some advice on how to win custody of my kids." That's precisely what I am trying to do, but your defenses are deafening you to what I am saying.
Dual Parenting, not Duel Parenting.