Postby spritom » Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:24 am
You don't prove that you're a better parent. That's stuff for TV.
You show that you have a good plan for the children and that you are willing, able, and would love to carry out that positive plan for the children.
If you have to go negative, then you show the court that the other side can't carry out their plan or that their plan is not positive for the children. This is the minor part of your presentation.
The rare times in which you would go negative specifically against the other person is:
* drugs
* danger to the children
* felony (most felonies, not all)
* other person lied to the court in a way that would help your case
It's not about the parents. The court hates parents. It's all about which plan for the children is....better.
Even when talking to the court about yourself, it's not a job interview where it's me-me-me...you learn to re-talk so that everything is you doing things for the good of the children. Things aren't your parenting time, it's the children's time with both parents.
-----
You're sitting in a fantastic temporary seat. When you're ahead in the game, don't make drastic moves and run out the clock...it's in your favor. Going for the "status quo" is a great strategy in this type of case.
Offer to negotiate an early settlement, but if there's resistance, go forward with the case (which is a form of negotiation in itself).
Hang in there!