Some interesting points from the article:
They talked of how little they trusted each other to be reliable mates, and of how the government safety net encourages poor parents to stay single.
Holy sh*t, someone else sees it. I was just talking about this in FOF's thread regarding CP CS spending. I couldn't agree more with this comment.
“A baby makes a woman grow up, but not a man,” she said. “I can’t imagine ever depending on a man. I don’t trust them.”
Gee, I feel the same way about my ex-wife. Depend on my ex-wife? Um, no. Not even a chance. She doesn't even pay CS! I wonder if this woman ever met another woman that will work harder to not work than she will at a job. I think I need to introduce these two NJ's.
Many women described a lifestyle of dating in which relationships sometimes resulted in children, but less often in fathers deeply involved in their families.
Stereotyping doesn't do much for anyone. Not all men are like that, just like not all women are mother's of the year.
Her husband, a prison guard, is involved in the lives of his own previous children, a quality that drew her to him.
Anyone ever hear this from a woman that you've dated? I have, probably three to four times. I think the stereotyping is so bad that when women see a father who is very involved with their kids, it turns them on! That's an easy score!:D
“We can all stick our chests out and say, ‘We don’t need no man to raise our babies,’ ” Ms. Noble-Garner said. “I would honestly tell them, ‘Honey, yes you do. You might not need him financially, but your baby needs a father.’ ”
Good quote. This woman deserves props. I can remember when me and NJ initially started going through divorce, she said I will pay a ton of money for CS but I don't need to see the kids very often. This woman here, Ms. Noble-Garner, knows that having a good dad involved in a kids life is priceless.