Thoughts?
Its not some archaic law that prevents the father from doing that. He violated the decree, to which he previously agreed the child would be raised a jew.
Its the court enforcing the contract of the parenting plan.
Read the case. I was surprised the court took such a stance but its established case law in this state. Mother had decision making authority over religion as agreed to in the settlement agreement. Father violated the agreement. The court enforced.
Pretty cut and dried.
I'll add this though, the court says
"As an aside, we note that even in the absence of an agreement, the custodial parent has the authority to determine religious training, and that "[o]nce custody has been awarded, courts should be loath to interfere with the religious training sanctioned by the custodian, since no end of difficulties would arise if judges sought to prescribe or proscribe the selection of a religious faith made by a custodial parent.So the question to the OP , again, is what does the parenting plan say?