Postby Pete » Sun May 22, 2005 9:05 pm
If the court order says 4:30, then that it is what it is.
However, techically, the < parenting time > is only your time, not your current wife's. Your current wife has no standing with that respect, and if it were argued in court, it would be unsuccessful.
While it is certainly reasonable that your wife maintain the < parenting time > "as ordered" when you are unable to, it is also certainly reasonable that the child's mother have the child when you are unable to exercise your rights. That being said, the court ordered time ends at 4:30, the argument ends there on that point. However, if your ex wife chooses to seek a modifiation of the custody order to specify that you must be present for the < parenting time >, she can likely have it changed fairly easily, particularly if you are not able to present for the full allotted time.
It kind of works like this....the court will not see it as your time ( as a couple, i.e. in your context above), and will see it as time ordered for you to exercise parenting time with your child. if you are unable to exercise your rights, than the other parent, if able, should be able to have the child.
The court would also likely agree that your < parenting time > ends when you personally are not physically able to exercise the time.
If your current decree has something to the effect of a right of first refusal granting the other party first choice when the possessive parent is unable to be with the child, your ex wife would be able claim that as well to obtain the child at the time you board the flight.
Don't worry about what you cannot control. Focus on what is legally relevant, not morally indignant or petty.