Postby tom kirkpatrick » Sat May 12, 2012 12:35 pm
FYI Gentlemen -
A good deal of my family court experience, much from which The List was derived, was the result of a nasty parenting action my son went through in Seattle.
Let the reader understand, Seattle prides itself as being (uber) progressive.
Translation = In spite of what "they" tell you, fathers don't stand a prayer in family court, especially in a venue like Seattle.
In today's world, every father must believe this without question. Make no mistake. This is your axiom, your premise, indeed your very starting point of reasoning in this feminist-domonated arena of the family court industry.
Granted, to say that The List stirs controversy is gross understatement. I would rather say that The List has kindled a long overdue conversation among fathers caught in the throes of family court. The barrier to overcome however, is the decades-long brainwashing, indeed the very grooming, men have undergone since early childhood.
To the newbie, I say this. Step out of "the box" and observe our social mores more closely. Who is favored, and who is not? It doesn't take rocket science to conclude that a very well-established, a well-entrenched "structured mothering cult" exists in virtually every genre of our western culture.
For example, consider Mother's Day. It's not merely a celebration of motherhood. It's become a platform to demand evermore "equal rights." Trouble is, there's nothing "equal" about it. Yet, we've come to accept it as is, virtually without question.
To the uninformed I will say this. The day will come when you will have wished you had paid closer attention to those principles laid out in The List. As you shall discover, hopefully not too late, The List is for those who have dared peer across that cultural divide and have caught a glimpse of the horror that lies in their not-too-distant future.
As many have concluded, no pretender could have authored anything close to The List. Not only was it difficult to write, it was most difficult to use, especially against someone who bore my children and someone I loved most dearly. Indeed gentlemen, this is the very barrier unsuspecting fathers fail to overcome. And simultaneously, it is that same barrier (reinforced by deeply entrenched social mores) that is used against us by the family court junta.
To those of us who have been there, this makes perfect sense. On the other hand, the unbelieving newbie must be converted. Difficult though it may be, the sooner this occurs, the better.
I trust this makes sense.
Tom