Postby dr_white » Wed Jun 06, 2012 11:22 am
I had the trial, and tried to offer the journal into evidence as an exhibit. Opposing counsel made a huge stink about it being hearsay, prejudicial, irrelevant, on and on and on; pretty much every objection in the book. The judge sustained the objection. I tried to explain the relevance, but the judge wouldn't hear it. The judge instead wanted to hear my direct testimony as opposed to me just reading things from the journal. Which I did, but fumbled a bit trying to articulate the best highlights.
So where did I go wrong? Those of you that have gotten your journal into evidence, how did you (or your attorneys) do it?
Get a library card. Start checking out books on law and how to win your case.